Edorium Journal of

Biochemistry

 
  Table of Contents    
Editorial
 
Hypogonadism in men with diabetes: Should testosterone replacement therapy be based on evidence based testosterone levels and lifetime risk reduction?
Sudarshan Ramachandran1,2,3, Geoffrey I. Hackett4,5, Richard C. Strange6
1Professor of Metabolic Medicine, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University Hospitals of North Midlands, Staffordshire, England, United Kingdom
2Professor, Faculty of Health Sciences, Staffordshire University, Staffordshire, England, United Kingdom
3Consultant Chemical Pathologist, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Heart of England Foundation Trust, West Midlands, England, United Kingdom
4Consultant in Urology, Heart of England Foundation Trust, West Midlands, England, United Kingdom
5Professor, University of Bedfordshire, Bedfordshire, England, United Kingdom
6Professor, Metabolic Research Group, Institute of Science and Technology in Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, England, United Kingdom

Article ID: 100004B01SR2017
doi:10.5348/B01-2017-4-ED-4

Address correspondence to:
Professor Sudarshan Ramachandran
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust
Good Hope Hospital, Rectory Road, Sutton Coldfield
West Midlands
United Kingdom

Access full text article on other devices

  Access PDF of article on other devices

[HTML Abstract]   [PDF Full Text [Print This Article]
[Similar article in Pumed] [Similar article in Google Scholar]

How to cite this article
Ramachandran S, Hackett GI, Strange RC. Hypogonadism in men with diabetes: Should testosterone replacement therapy be based on evidence based testosterone levels and lifetime risk reduction? Edorium J Biochem 2017;2:1–3.


While data from numerous randomized controlled trials have allowed the establishing of evidence based guidelines for statin use in the prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) [1], there remains considerable debate as to which patients should be treated. Indeed, as far back as 2000, we questioned whether lipid lowering treatment guidelines should be based on absolute risk reduction (ARR) or relative risk reduction (RRR) [2]. Until recently, treatment strategies have focused on high absolute risk thresholds in order to obtain maximal ARR as opposed to RRR. However, evidence for considering lifetime risk reduction as opposed to ARR is mounting and this has been highlighted in the latest Joint British Societies 3 recommendations for prevention of CVD [1].

We recently showed that hypogonadism (HG), defined as sexual symptoms and total testosterone < 12.0 nmol/l (346.1 ng/dl), in men with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is associated with higher all-cause mortality [3]. Importantly, testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) in such men abolishes this increased risk, independently of improvements in metabolic parameters and, statin and phosphodiesterase 5-inhibitor treatments. We further characterized this benefit by showing that TRT alters the association between age and mortality [4].

Figure 1 demonstrates the discrepancy between ARR and lifetime risk reduction following a mean TRT of 3.7 years duration [3][4]. This figure shows the ARR, RRR and lifetime risk reduction that could be expected by treating these men at 55 and 65 years of age. Whilst the ARR is greater in the treated 65-year-old (8.1%) than in the 55-year-old (3.6%) man, lifetime risk reduction is significantly greater when TRT is initiated at 55 years of age. Similar to lipid lowering, the RRR associated with TRT is similar at both ages selected. Based on these results we make a case for earlier treatment and also for not using absolute risk thresholds in men with diabetes and HG. We acknowledge that we have not taken cost effectiveness into account as the underlying risk of mortality in men with HG and T2DM is very high, as evident in (Figure 1).

Laboratory testosterone measurement is recommended in men with HG (including T2DM) and obesity [5][6]. The threshold testosterone level requiring TRT should also be addressed. Quoted laboratory reference ranges (Mayo Medical Laboratories: total testosterone reference range 240–950 ng/ml (8.3–33.0 nmol/l); http://www.mayomedicallaboratories.com/test-catalog/Clinical+and+Interpretive/83686 in adult men) are often inconsistent with the clinical presentation [7] . Thus, evidence exists indicating that treatment thresholds should be 8.7 nmol/l (250.9 ng/dl) in non-diabetic [8] and 10.4 nmol/l (300.0 ng/dl) in diabetic men [9], unless contraindicated. It is important that laboratories keep up with research developments and move away from reference ranges based on the population distribution of the analyte to levels more likely to be clinically useful. Hence, interaction between clinicians and laboratory personnel is essential. To further illustrate this point we turn again to cholesterol concentrations and statin treatment, a field mature in evidence based medicine. Statin treatment is tailored to the underlying risk of the individual and not a laboratory reference range. The low density lipoprotein cholesterol reference range has been replaced by a target value of 1.8 mmol/l (70 mg/dl) in secondary prevention based on evidence [10]. We conclude that it is also important that we observe developments in parallel clinical conditions and apply them when appropriate to our own field.

Keywords: Hypogonadism, Mortality risk reduction, Testosterone, Testosterone replacement therapy, Type 2 diabetes


Cursor on image to zoom/Click text to open image
Figure 1: A comparison of absolute risk reduction, relative risk reduction and lifetime risk reduction in men with hypogonadism (sexual symptoms and total testosterone < 12 nmol/l (346.1 ng/dl) and type 2 diabetes, treated and untreated with testosterone.



REFERENCES
  1. Joint British Societies' consensus recommendations for the prevention of cardiovascular disease (JBS3). Heart 2014 Apr;100 Suppl 2:ii1–67.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 1
  2. Ramachandran S, French JM, Vanderpump MP, Croft P, Neary RH. Should treatment recommendations for lipid lowering drugs be based on absolute coronary risk or risk reduction? BMJ 2000;320(7236):677–9.    Back to citation no. 2
  3. Hackett G, Heald AH, Sinclair A, Jones PW, Strange RC, Ramachandran S. Serum testosterone, testosterone replacement therapy and all-cause mortality in men with type 2 diabetes: Retrospective consideration of the impact of PDE5 inhibitors and statins. Int J Clin Pract 2016 Mar;70(3):244–53.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 3
  4. Hackett G, Jones PW, Strange RC, Ramachandran S. Statin, testosterone and phosphodiesterase 5-inhibitor treatments and age related mortality in diabetes. World J Diabetes 2017 Mar 15;8(3):104–11.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 4
  5. Dohle G, Arver S, Bettocchi C, Jones T, Kliesch S Punab M. EAU Guidelines on Male Hypogonadism. 2015. [Available at: https://uroweb.org/wp-content/uploads/18-Male-Hypogonadism_LR.pdf]    Back to citation no. 5
  6. Garvey WT, Mechanick JI, Brett EM, et al. American association of clinical endocrinologists and American college of endocrinology comprehensive cllnical practice guidelines for medical care of patients with obesity. Endocr Pract 2016 Jul;22 Suppl 3:1–203.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 6
  7. Strange RC, Burdett H, Hackett G, Ramachandran S. The metabolic syndrome: A more useful prognostic marker for CVD if testosterone and urate were included? J Endocrinol Diab Res 2016;2(1):100107.    Back to citation no. 7
  8. Shores MM, Smith NL, Forsberg CW, Anawalt BD, Matsumoto AM. Testosterone treatment and mortality in men with low testosterone levels. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012 Jun;97(6):2050–8.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 8
  9. Muraleedharan V, Marsh H, Kapoor D, Channer KS, Jones TH. Testosterone deficiency is associated with increased risk of mortality and testosterone replacement improves survival in men with type 2 diabetes. Eur J Endocrinol 2013 Oct 21;169(6):725–33.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 9
  10. Ray KK, Kastelein JJ, Boekholdt SM, et al. The ACC/AHA 2013 guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk in adults: The good the bad and the uncertain: A comparison with ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias 2011. Eur Heart J 2014 Apr;35(15):960–8.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 10

[HTML Abstract]   [PDF Full Text]


Acknowledgements

The study was supported by a grant from Bayer to cover practice expenses. The sponsor had no role in the design of the study, statistical analysis, findings or preparation of manuscripts.


Author Contributions
Sudarshan Ramachandran – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Geoffrey I. Hackett – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Richard C. Strange – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Guarantor of submission
The corresponding author is the guarantor of submission.
Source of support
None
Conflict of interest
Professor Geoffrey I Hackett has received honoraria for serving as a speaker for Bayer plc who provided the study grant. Professor Sudarshan Ramachandran has received honoraria for serving as a speaker for Besins Health Care Ltd. Professor Geoffrey I Hackett has spoken at various national and international meetings on testosterone and PDE5I treatments in men and sits on the committee of the European Society for Sexual Medicine.
Copyright
© 2017 Sudarshan Ramachandran et al. This article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original author(s) and original publisher are properly credited. Please see the copyright policy on the journal website for more information.



  Home line About the Journal line Aim and Scope line Open Access line Archives
Apply as Editor line Apply as Reviewer line Submit Reviews - Editors line Submit Reviews - Reviewers
Instructions for Authors line Templates to Use line Copyright Form line Author Checklist
Online Submission line Email Submission line Submit Revision line Submit All Forms line Submit Page Proofs
Terms of Service line Privacy policy line Disclaimer line FAQ line Contact: Journal line Contact: Edorium Journals line Site Map
 
  Copyright © 2015. Edorium. All rights reserved.